October 25, 2012Dear Sir,Regarding his review of the Charman Prize, it appears that Dr Charles Zuill has standards that Bermudians are unable to fulfill. I applaud Masterworks’ inclusiveness as it allows for aspirations to be inspired and exhibited. What is Dr Zuill’s agenda in criticising this aspect? The expression of the human spirit is singular and unique to each one of us, whether it comes from a child or a recognised artist. Dr Zuill misses the point of this artistic awakening of an island nation, and he is not disingenuous as he submits he knows a good deal more about how things should be done. However, his intentions to be constructive and helpful are empty words as they have provided nothing of the sort. Mediocrity is certainly not an attribute to ascribe to those who strive to express the inexpressible, at any given level of their development, and I am sure that each artist offered their creations for public scrutiny with sincerity of purpose and openness of heart that appears not to have touched Dr Zuill.I did not see this year’s submissions, but had the honour of adjudicating last year’s prize. The spirit of the Island was in every work. There were many deserving works and only a few were chosen, but the assembly of such a wide range of skills and talents, all of whom succeeded in their own way, was a poignant display of a willing and engaged community. Perhaps I saw the works with different eyes coming from abroad, but I am ever mindful that the sparks of creativity can be easily extinguished by the mediocrity of conventional standards of judgment. Masterworks is one of the most remarkable organisations of its kind in the world. It has become a valuable hub for cultural awareness, education, and learning. Bermudians should be proud. Every Bermudian.LASZLO CSERToronto, Ontario