Charles Asnavour and Frank Sinatra once wrote a ballad called Young at Heart and the opening lyrics to the legendary song say that “fairy tales can come true; they can happen to you”.

Certainly the Canadian redevelopers of the airport comprised of the Canadian Crown Corporation, (CCC) and their Canadian partner in the deal Aecon, must now feel that their Bermuda fairytale has indeed come true or soon will be.

The airport redevelopment project appears to be moving fast despite the rising opposition and the Donald Trump-style wall built by Bob Richards, the finance minister, which at least for the time being is sealing off all access to the critical aspects of what he terms the “interim” agreement that was signed between the developers and the Ministry of Finance.

In fact, the finance minister, unlike Mr Trump, who at least has promised to make the Mexican government build his wall, from what we now know, has decided to build his solely on the taxpayers’ dime.

But cracks are showing. Outrage is also growing.

In Bermuda you know when it has reached critical mass when both black and white Bermudians begin to sing from the same hymnal, as appeared to be the case yesterday in opposition to the deal.

Not only has the Opposition been stymied in its attempt to obtain the relevant information from Mr Richards in order to fulfil its constitutional duty in this matter but the list of other entities who have also came up against Mr Richard’s wall is beginning to read like a who’s who.

Firstly, with respect to the Public Accounts Committee, which is chaired by David Burt, the Shadow Minister of Finance, the level of obstructionism exhibited by the Government here has been borderline insidious and even farcical.

Last week, for example, respective Government members of the committee refused even to show up for a scheduled meeting in order to stonewall the process of disclosure.

Both MP Susan Jackson and the Minister of Finance even sought to advance the thoroughly dubious proposition that Mr Burt, the PAC chairman, did not have the authority to even issue summonses without, I assume, the blessing of the One Bermuda Alliance members.

This view of course is not shared by the Speaker of the House, who is the ultimate authority.

Secondly, The Royal Gazette was denied a freedom of information request in relation to the project on two separate occasions by the Ministry of Finance.

The respective parties were seeking the nine schedules that are a key component of the signed initial agreement, along with any other relevant information.

Returning to the issue of the taxpayers’ dollars, Mr Burt recited what amounts to a bill of indictment against the deal at a recent Progressive Labour Party town hall meeting in St George’s that gets longer by the day.

Disputing the $250,000 per month estimate of electricity cost for the completed airport that he has committed to underwrite, Mr Richards now asserts that the figure is more likely to average approximately $190,000 per month in line with current usage.

But even at the $190,000 per month average it will still result in Aecon and/or the Canadian operators of the finished airport obtaining an obscene windfall of approximately $2.28 million per year. This amounts to a $68-million taxpayer subsidy over the 30-year life of the proposed agreement.

As to the above assertion by Mr Burt that the Minister of Finance has committed to underwrite the cost of electricity at the airport, Mr Richards failed to repudiate that claim at a recent press conference held this week.

But let us not stop there. For this to truly be a romantic fairytale between our Government and their preferred Canadian developer who, I might add, did not even have to go through a more normal courtship by way of a competitive bidding process, it required much, much more.

It appears that in order to convince the developer and operator of his unbridled affection, the finance minister has committed to also exempt them from paying the employer’s share of payroll tax, customs duties and work-permit fees.

The Canadians were in addition, granted a very favourable termination clause that allows them to back out of the deal at any time during this phase, with the Bermuda Government obligated to pay them for the privilege of doing so to the tune of potentially millions of dollars.

This and the other incentives — some of which are not outlined here — are a clear example of how the risk transfer model undergirding this deal is skewed too far in favour of the Canadians. This is ensuring that the value proposition associated with this project, as touted by the finance minister, may indeed be illusory when all is said and done.

As noted last week, the little we do know reeks of Government desperation and it appears, outrageous political overreach.

It may also reek of privatisation of a public asset through the back door.

Both sides sincerely wish to see Bermuda’s economy generating jobs and opportunity for Bermudians.

However, the emerging outlines of this deal that have managed to seep through the growing cracks in Mr Richards’ wall of obstructionism increasingly give us and growing numbers of Bermudians pause. And they should do.

• Rolfe Commissiong is a Progressive Labour Party MP